Category Archives: Academic Life

Some Things Will Change… Some Won’t…

As an academic, some things will change my end. Like I won’t be able to take a train when I want to from now. (Teaching commitments!) And I can’t spam you guys any more about my Subway adventures on Twitter.

But many things won’t. I’m no acadsnob. I’ll be a very different kind of academic. Like… (Read on for more…)

• I’ll still be tweeting and be posting on Facebook.
• I’ll still just ask you to call me David. (I’m thinking if I should throw letters address to an eventual “Prof Dr Feng” in the bin. Na-ah. But I don’t put on airs for the heck of it.)
• I’ll still have this thing for trains. It’s permanent. One big fat Beijing traffic jam did it for me.
• I’ll still be travelling — if not to libraries and universities, then overseas. There’s a whole African continent I’ve yet to set foot on, if you want an example of why.
• I’ll still be blogging and doing tech.
• I’ll still be doing media shows.
• I’ll still be doing Chinglish.
• I’ll still be writing books.
• I’ll still be emailing friends and getting back when I can to emails from total strangers.
• I’ll still be speaking at schools and at events.
• I’ll still be attending tweet ups.
• I’ll still kiss my wife good night every day.

I’m sure I haven’t exhausted this list…

That’s as I gratefully accept a job offer from the Communication University of China as foreign education expert (teacher) in English, Western culture, and media, beginning September 2012. I’m expected to be a Lecturer (Assistant Professor in the US).

A Firm Vow to Educate and to Inspire

Just about two hours ago at the spa, two men entered the changing room — one smoking — and unleashed some pretty tough and foul language upon clients that they didn’t like dealing with. My first thought that flashed through me: these guys are biz people.

Biz people aren’t evil, I swear. My Dad majored in economics, and he had some super cool academics guide him through his “econ work”, as was referred to by my teachers in high school. As long as you realise that money isn’t everything, then it’s no sin to do biz.

But what’s most fearful about these people is that some care only about the cash. Worse, there are horror stories that a “successful man” today must be one with not “just” one million in the bank, but also more than one wife. This has been a huge problem in especially East Asia, and more so in the Sinosphere. Worse still, talent these days are either flowing overseas (throw money at, say, Canada, and you’ll get naturalised!) or going into huge “biz things” where the only thing that’s of concern is the bottom line. There’s also a bit of money to be made — albeit illegally — in government: corruption is nothing new here in China, but lately, it has just gotten far worse. Former rail minister Liu Zhijun’s corruption is but the tip of the iceberg. Ultimately, it’s about the money, be the involvement more .com or more .gov.

Very few people actually care to educate and inspire the kids of the future. China’s population peak has yet to be reached: there’ll be more kids out on the streets. They’ll sadly come out with perverted and twisted views — such as “Money, Money Über Alles” — or that infidelity is OK. Unless education makes a major abrupt-turn and kids are told what is correctly correct, this country with five millennia of civilisation is headed at high speeds on tracks leading it to an ultimately painful collision with a moral and civics iceberg — and then it might really hurt.

As of late, for those of you who’ve been keeping tabs on social media, something pretty unpleasant has happened my end, but that’s not enough to get me out of “edu mode”. My firm vow to educate and to inspire the kids of the future will continue no matter what happens. It’s not just China that needs a fixer-upper of sorts to get people away from Money, Money, Money. Look at the London Olympics. It’s a disaster right now just days before it’s underway. It’s about the Games being totally commercialised (Barcelona 1992 was the last “good” Olympics). Look at the US, now in Deep Doo-Doo Mode because of that 1980s quip — “Greed is Good”. Even Switzerland’s in it now. The country’s no longer the one that I could spend a lifetime in since the unsightly 2009 institution of the anti-humanity “minaret ban”. It’s not about putting on ice a mere religious symbol. It’s the latent danger that this restriction on your conscience (religion’s a big thing!) could spread to your other liberties. Imagine if you got arrested in Bern (out of all places!) just because you tweeted stuff like BLOODY GOVERNMENT NEVER CONSULTS WITH THE CITIZENRY BEFORE MAKING DUMB DECISIONS. It’s a slippery slope that could very well happen!

The only way to save all of this from happening is to inform and educate the masses. I don’t know what my next edu gig will be, but I’m confident that it’s going to be in the edu world. I’m sold that I can do my bit to save us from this sad state of affairs. There’s no more time for inaction. It’s time to be in action.

Insecurity Kills

As of late I’ve graduated in semi-stealth with a PhD (or rather, “Doctor of Arts”) in communications (especially social media) from the Communication University of China. (It’s where, supposedly, people must have been taught how to communicate with one other — although I’ll lay off the “making-fun-of-my-alma-mater” for now…)

Seriously, I’ve kept the PhD thing very low key. That’s because there’s a lot of wild academics in China who are wild — because they’ve that PhD thingy themselves. There are cowards with the PhD who will attack up-and-coming authors, established Google executives, and holders of PhDs from diploma mills, but who will never think of muckraking the government — a perfect reason why they’re cowards, buck naked. There are Chinese on the mainland whom, forgetting that the folks “down south” in Hong Kong belong to the same old PRC, denigrate them as “dogs” and “canines” (well, actually, the two are much the same), earning them the ire the mainland madman insulter “deserves”. And then there are those in other lands, whom, they believe, are “armed” with an academic degree, thus “enabling” them to set themselves loose in criticizing society until they’re blue in the face. What I’m trying to get across here is that there are a lot of madmen out there with PhDs, so I wanted to isolate myself from them. I’m very different: I hate academia-ese, have been overseas (lots of local PhD candidates have been mainland-only), and actually have a better idea of how this world’s supposed to work.

For the last three years, I’ve been, instead, travelling by train as much as I can. I wanted to discover, outside classes, the real China. The poor bits. The rich bits. The bits and bobs that are ugly, cruel, crass, but also those that are cool, neat, advanced, “wow”-ish and most importantly, real. I know what these “leaders” so-called get when they visit a village: they get a mock show “insuring” them that all is well. All is not well! There must have been a farmer who lost a member of his or her family because they refused to move for a new übermodern mall to replace their former home in the hinterlands! And I’ve seen how big the government squares in this part of the world can get. The one in Jiaozhou, Shandong, was so big that I felt like I was living a freakin’ nightmare whilst even driving across the whole thing (on the way to the train station, of course).

After three years of the whole PhD show, I can say that not only have I come out with an original dissertation on how to tame social media better (whilst not losing out to either anarchy or authoritarianism), but that I’ve also seen the country — China — much better. I’ve finished a fair load of Habermas’s own works on the public sphere in both German and English, and I’ve come across a few pretty neat and insightful works from Douglas Kellner in the US. I’ve also been to the 2009 Chinese Blogger Conference, where things started on a whimper with a lost academic at the start, but “got noisier” in the end as major online figures came out with their own two pence on society today — even telling participants that “they needed to teach government a lesson”.

Of course. The Deng Xiaoping era was remarkable, and was remembered for one slogan: “To lead is to serve”. Jefferson and Co also were firm believers that if government stank, the people would come out with a remix in no time. So when that happens, nobody’s scared. There’s no insecurity. We’d be blunt and come out with the truth.

But the one big thing about China today is that there’s no real truth the higher you go. We have executives with fake PhD diplomas, bosses-to-be with missing this-and-thats when it comes to the question, “Do you have a Doctor’s degree?”, and academic cowards. Cowards who are full of insecurity, and who, whilst rooting for democracy and free speech, nix anyone online who tweets but the slightest bit of opposition or even asks them a question they don’t like. Cowards who have questionable academic track records; cowards who must obviously have numerous romantic affairs; and cowards who have amassed their own millions, billions even, through grey and shady practises. Chinese society is like a tofu mansion: we’re “waiting” for that Magnitude 9 earthquake when we’ll see a massive house cleaning. It’s time to send the corrupt (morally, economically, and whatever) into what’s known as /dev/null/ in UNIX-speak. It’s time to take a great, big, fat waste bag and clean house (like I said). It’s time to right the wrong (and to make sure no wrongs are righted). It’s time to give Western China 350 km/h HSR, not the crappy 250 km/h variant that’s out of date the moment the test machines roll onto ’em.

As David Feng (sans the “Dr” bit, please), I don’t feel the least insecure. I’ve done my bit, my PhD, the right way. I’ve been a little secretive about it, but that’s so as not to appear as an academic snob. In whatever I’m doing next, I’m sure about one thing: that I’ll use my all to make this planet a better place to live. Whether it means installing toilets closer to the coffee shops (as folks do have a tendency to over-indulge in all that liquid stuff!) or creating less corrupt people, whether it’s about preparing locals better for the wider world or giving students-to-be less crappier classrooms (with, of course, the ventilation working), or making students-to-be talkative by forcing them to the microphone, whatever I’m to do next, I’m gonna make sure that I’m not the winner at the end of the day, because that means nothing to me.

Instead, I’m going to make all of those that I teach, the winners at the end of the day. I’ll just be a guy telling them how to do this and that, or what not to say or touch, and stuff like that. I’m no edu god or any kind of god. I’m just human. I’ve an expiry date only heaven knows. The thing is to right as many wrongs and make the planet as cool and as friendly as possible before I hit that big, fat, ole expiry date.

And if there is indeed a Round Two in all of this, I’m pre-programming this to start in CONTINUE mode. Because the quest for a better world does not have an end, and there’s always a way to make something already cool, even cooler.

David’s Next Steps…

I’m telling ya, I haven’t always had good impressions of quite a few textbooks (the one my mum bought me in Hong Kong about maths in primary school was a disaster, with super-crazy names of fictitious people all over the place), but at least I let ’em survive. I did throw away one book — the one I had for my MA in linguistics and media presenting — because the guy that authored it was an arrogant brat. No, seriously.

But as of late, I’ve been taking a good look at a kind of snow — you got that one right — a kind of snow — as in snowstorm — in a campus in central China. Turns out these were books that overworked students ripped out in anger as their university entrance exams were approaching. It was quite a sight.

Seriously, though, this is but the tip of the iceberg in the disaster that has become the Chinese educational world. The edu system in China is a mess. My French teacher told me never to feed on foie gras because those poor ducks were force-fed, and your karma kind of went down the sewer if you fed yourself with gusto on those poor souls with four feet.

Force-fed ducks are tragic enough. Force-fed people are a humanitarian disaster. Or an educational humanitarian disaster, rather: Chinese schools are notorious for force-feeding knowledge down innocent folks. There’s the bit about the students having to know when the “3rd Plenary of the 11th National Congress of the Chinese Communist Party” took place (late 1978), and then there’s outright maths madness. It’s awful. The Chinese are ruining their five millennia of top-notch civilisation by producing — exam-sitting machines. I laughed at Tokyo (out of pure innocent lack of knowledge) when I heard about cram schools in classes in Zurich. I shouldn’t have, and I take the naïve laughter back. What you are seeing in China is something that is far worse. These guys are coming out with exam-sitting machines by the millions, “thanks” to them force-feeding knowledge down those innocent kids.

(At age 16, they’re supposed to fall in love. And you wonder why so many “ageing youngsters” by the age of 28-ish to 30 are still single. It’s a mess.)

Worse things happen when these poor souls enter university: they are fed knowledge that they hardly ever process. Once graduated with a BA (or something like that), they “give back” their knowledge to the university — they have no way to use that un-applied knowledge in real life! And then you wonder why they’re yelled at by their money-is-everything bosses. It’s a vicious cycle.

The way I was taught in Switzerland was worlds apart, and I’m really thankful to Helvetia and her world-class international schools. In international schools in Zurich and Zug, we were in classes that had folks from Africa, Asia, Europe and the Americas in one roof, in one room. Not only that: I was fortunate to have sat the IGCSE and AP exams (as well as semi-flunk a PSAT, which was odd), so I knew how these things were. I know millions, if not close to a billion, are sitting nationwide university entrance exams. They’re terrible creatures. Let me tell you: our variants in Zurich, especially the IGCSE, meant nearly one to two full months of exams. You’d get maybe one day off for a quick speedboat fix, and then you’d be stuck in the exam centre for the rest of the week. So when 04 June 1998 came around (that was when all my IGCSEs were done), we rented two speedboats and started randomly hurling packs of ice tea into the lake.

It was the end of the worst months in our lives.

So yeah — I fully know what folks our part of the world are going through. I’m totally with you guys.

But in the end, I have to say, after nearly 20 countries and 12 years in Switzerland, that the Swiss grass is a fair bit greener. At least in Switzerland, our lessons are a bit more interactive, and we get the chance to question our teachers. There’s no brainwashing: it is perfectly OK — in fact encouraged of us — to question our teachers (within reason). And I have to say that out of my Facebook friends, there are a few teachers in the mix as well. It’s great: they’re irreplaceable fountains of knowledge that are there for you — both inside and outside the classroom. You don’t feel like you’re talking to a God of sorts, whom you fear not to criticise (of course, insults are most definitely not OK).

And the textbooks in those international schools in Switzerland are also pretty cool. Yeah, at about 1,200 pages a book, they’re monsters all right, but at least you get to be inspired by their knowledge. You get pictures along with the text. This is nearly never the case in China, where you encounter whole chapters of text, text and maybe a quick table, followed by more text, text, text, text. It’s boring! I’ve had some bad days where the teacher was fixed in three positions: she had her mouth in front of the microphone, her eyes on the sunken display, and her hand on the mouse and scroller, and she’d be in this position for the full 90-minute class. It was awful. I’d be reading my Lonely Planet guide about Hong Kong, and we’d get away with it. I’d think it a job as miserably done as, say, making fake money — these people get the same bit of “respect” (indeed, lack of respect) my end. It’s called doing a disservice — and it’s not what I want to do.

The thing with China is that those poor students are made like machines. They’re going through exams, and they swot it up. Then they dump it as soon as they get through (and not fail it). In the West, most study what they want — and probably not what makes them a million. Want Chinese-made talent? Loosen up the stress on the students. They deserve an easier life. Then they might want to talk a little more in class.

I clearly remember the media summer school I did a few years back — there were a load of Chinese students as well as a handful of international people (I was Swiss, so I belonged to the latter). Some of the most active discussions were those that were started by an Indian, a Swiss (me) and an American — I think — or he could have been a German as well. Just about the entire local Chinese student population were mute. Think about that. It was scary as hell… But that’s what you get when you make these poor people force-fed exam-sitting machines…

…that feed on nothing but “knowledge” from teachers and experts. It’s not to say all academics are evil — but we do have a fair share of rotten apples in the barrels. Some academics hate it when their student does better than they are. Some just outright bend their academic interests with their commercial interests. I’ve heard horror stories of sub-par textbooks being printed because of suspect business/academic relationships.

The fact is, as Apple said in an earlier brochure, you’re only given one chance to inspire students. That’s it. It’s a single-ride ticket. It’ll be hard to inspire them again at age 40 when you’ve mucked up at age 14…

Slavish devotion to “experts” and academically shaky “teachers” can be scary. I’ve experienced it myself when I was invited by city government officials twice about solving Beijing’s Chinglish lessons — only to be told that it was more the problem of their “experts” and that, in essence, the group of “experts” OKed a translation that rendered a touch-screen info kiosk in the Beijing Subway system as an “automatic analyser” in perfect Chinglish. The machine doesn’t deserve this. The nation doesn’t deserve this. A land of five proud millennia behind it doesn’t deserve to be led by a bunch of folks who think they know everything — when everything they do says otherwise.

The fact is, being lost in a country where you are told to “be mind your head” and to keep clear of the “bus zhuanyong” lane is pretty much surreal. It’s also insane and can drive you bananas when you run into signs that tell you that “Meng is not driving the vehicle abduction”. I know I’ve seen some sick Chinglish, which is why I did a little book about the phenomenon in Chinese last year. I tried to keep it real and approachable by using lingo that every last farmer out there can understand (so that I’m uniting the readership by the lowest common denominator). I did the book to raise awareness to the issue — it hasn’t made me a millionaire (and I can care less if it could or could not), so I deliberately made it affordable. A good edu guy cares about the results, not about whether or not he’s a stinking-rich millionaire. Further, I made it so that people get the best results while spending the least cash, so the content you’re seeing is the result of late nights wondering how best to translate the Chinglish sign at the local station. The book earnt me a late autumn 2011 invitation to northeastern China to teach “Chinglish” (if you will!) to an audience of hundreds. I’ve also been in the blackboard outside of these times, and I’ve taught anything from primary school kids to adult education lessons, including private tutoring.

Teaching is about inspiring people. I was most honoured at being inspired by multilingual, multicultural content in international school in Switzerland. My 12 years there, as well as my travel experiences to nearly 20 countries and territories, tell the tale. I’ve spent around 20 years as a student, as one that is being inspired, and I’m grateful to all my teachers as well as to my classmates.

Inspirers are those that make tomorrow a better day. Hopefully, fellow students in Hubei will have easier times in the years to come as they resort to preparing for their exams in more practical ways. But I fully understand their ire, and their frustration, as their books were torn to pieces by themselves. I’ve got to change these things, and to inspire others. And I’m willing to, as someone who has just passed his Doctorate dissertation defence, inspire the students of the future. I’m dedicating my total effort to this. You’ve seen how much I’ve dedicated my efforts to the trains. Now I’m at least doubling that effort so that the students I teach and inspire get the future they rightfully deserve.

I’ll stay on the trains, though — it’s a great way to get from home to the schools and to different places on the planet. The trains will continue to take me to new places I’ve never been to at fast and safe speeds. And I’ll continue to be a learner for the rest of my life.

David Feng
08 June 2012
Onboard Chinese HSR Train G123